Brock Boeser
Vancouver Canucks · RW · R shot · age 29 at the dated snapshot.
- Team
- VAN
- Lane
- RW
- Age
- 29
How the points were built
Official NHL 2025–26 regular-season reports. A missing split stays “—”; it is never converted to zero.
3 RW regulars in VAN
The all-team median is 3.5. VAN’s farm system ranks #14 in the maintained two-board consensus.
Questions a GM still has to answer
- How much of the scoring comes at five-on-five, on special teams, or into an empty net?
- Is the player creating the play, finishing it, or receiving a secondary point?
- Does deployment reveal trust, scarcity, underuse, or a role the roster cannot offer?
- What contract, acquisition cost, development alternative and Cup-window effect complete the argument?
VAN at EDM
Projected slot from the licensed depth chart; props from the model's learned layer on shots, finishing and the opposing starter; ratings are last season's until this one has enough games. Information, not a recommendation.
Nothing listed against Brock Boeser.
Brock Boeser is talked about more than most (88th percentile); attention is up on the usual
How much he is being talked about: the league's own stories tagged to him, daily pageviews of his Wikipedia article against his own 90-day baseline, posts naming him on the connected networks (Bluesky), and the roster moves and listings that make noise. A measure of attention. Whether it affects a player is his business, and a question the history will let us test later.
Social: 19 posts named him this week on Bluesky · 77 likes, reposts and replies · no baseline yet, it needs a week of readings.
$7.25M cap hit
2026–27 through 2032–33. Certified
Role question › Costs more per point than the position median and is below the line on five-on-five creation and penalty-kill use. Either the contract or the deployment needs a look.
- Cost and production both sit close to his position's median. Nothing unusual drives this reading.
- 58 real points at this cap hit would pass the cost test (he had 43, after 1 empty-net left out).
- A five-on-five rate of 1.68 per 60 (he had 1.24) or a regular penalty-kill role (1:00+ a night) would pass the Cup side.
Expected goals
CapOrCup's shot model (distance, angle, shot type, strength, rebounds, rushes), trained on 2023-24 and 2024-25 and tested on unseen games (AUC 0.756). Finishing is goals minus expected goals; it is noisy in one season.
What happens while he plays
Measured from the league's play-by-play and shift charts, not from the scoresheet. Expected goals are counted for every player on the ice, and a goal is credited to whoever was on the ice when the sequence began, including players who had changed off before it was scored.
Goals, assists and plus/minus, weighted by what they changed
Every goal counts the win probability it added, scaled so the average goal is 1.0: a late tying goal counts several, a goal at 6-1 or into an empty net late counts little. Plus/minus also credits the players on the ice when the goal's sequence began.
Where he shoots from, and how it goes
Every unblocked shot placed by distance, angle and shot type. His rate from each spot is set against the league's rate for the same shot from the same spot, so the edge is against everyone else taking that shot, not against an average.
What the condensed games showed
Read from the league's free condensed games (1 game so far): entries, exits, battles and turnovers the model could see and attribute to his jersey number. A condensed game is a sample of the game, so these are observations, not season counts.
Most often up against: O. Michaels (1).
Brock Boeser, season by season
Each dot is one season. The amber bar is what his earlier seasons and his age predicted for that season (80% band), so a dot far above its bar is a season the numbers did not see coming. The shaded band is where most players at his position sit at each age.
Position band: quantile regression (10th/50th/90th) of qualifying seasons on an age spline, weighted for players who drop out.
What the numbers found
- Exceeded ceiling chance at the draft of going this far past the projection: under 5%
Projection at the draft: 34 NHL hours through age 25 expected (80% band 1-101); he logged 122, above the 90th percentile.
Projection at the draft
At the draft the model expected 34 NHL hours through his age-25 season (80% band 1 to 101). He logged 122 hours, above the 90th percentile.
Every season
| Season | Age | GP | Level | Expected (80%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | 19 | 9 | 47.7 | 5.4 to 80.6 |
| 2017-18 | 20 | 62 | 70.7 | 29.8 to 76.3 |
| 2018-19 | 21 | 69 | 63.7 | 55.5 to 87.7 |
| 2019-20 | 22 | 57 | 62.2 | 54.2 to 86.0 |
| 2020-21 | 23 | 56 | 70.5 | 52.3 to 84.3 |
| 2021-22 | 24 | 71 | 48.6 | 56.0 to 86.6 |
| 2022-23 | 25 | 74 | 55.2 | 40.8 to 70.6 |
| 2023-24 | 26 | 81 | 68.3 | 40.7 to 70.1 |
| 2024-25 | 27 | 75 | 51.8 | 48.3 to 77.9 |
| 2025-26 | 28 | 75 | 48.4 | 38.8 to 68.7 |
Source: CapOrCup careers desk (method and league curves) · as of 2026-09-29
Who looked like this at 26 to 29
Careers are compared as league-adjusted points per game by age, over the same ages. The comparables below are the closest lines, and what matters is the spread of what they did next, not any single name.
This player so far: age 16 High-MN 1.81 → age 17 UMHSEL 1.00 → age 18 USHL 1.19 → age 19 NCAA 1.43 → age 20 NCAA 1.06 → age 21 NHL 0.89 → age 22 NHL 0.81 → age 23 NHL 0.79 → age 24 NHL 0.88 → age 25 NHL 0.65 → age 26 NHL 0.74 → age 27 NHL 0.90 → age 28 NHL 0.67 → age 29 NHL 0.64
| Player | Distance (lower is closer) | What he did afterwards |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan MarchessaultC · matched at ages 26, 27, 28, 29 | 0.07 | age 30 NHL 0.80 → age 31 NHL 0.87 → age 32 NHL 0.75 → age 33 NHL 0.84 → age 34 NHL 0.72 |
| Teuvo TeravainenC · matched at ages 26, 27, 28, 29 | 0.07 | age 30 NHL 0.71 → age 31 NHL 0.47 |
| Vincent TrocheckC · matched at ages 26, 27, 28, 29 | 0.09 | age 30 NHL 0.94 → age 31 NHL 0.72 → age 32 NHL 0.79 |
| Chandler StephensonC · matched at ages 26, 27, 28, 29 | 0.09 | age 30 NHL 0.65 → age 31 NHL 0.61 |
| Anders LeeL · matched at ages 26, 27, 28, 29 | 0.09 | age 30 NHL 0.70 → age 31 NHL 0.60 → age 32 NHL 0.61 → age 33 NHL 0.46 → age 34 NHL 0.66 |
| Ryan StromeC · matched at ages 26, 27, 28, 29 | 0.09 | age 30 NHL 0.52 → age 31 NHL 0.50 → age 32 NHL 0.27 |
| Elias LindholmC · matched at ages 26, 27, 28, 29 | 0.10 | age 30 NHL 0.57 → age 31 NHL 0.70 |
| Tomas HertlC · matched at ages 26, 27, 28, 29 | 0.10 | age 30 NHL 0.71 → age 31 NHL 0.84 → age 32 NHL 0.71 |
Reading it
If most comparables became NHL regulars and their later peak sits well above this player's current line, the numbers say there is room to grow. If most did not, the numbers say the odds are against it. Either way it is what the data shows, not a name chosen to flatter.
Every goal, with the league's video
Preseason, regular season and playoffs are kept apart. Each row links to the NHL's own highlight page; no video is hosted here. Where a clip has been reviewed, the reading of it is a model judgement of the frames, not a measurement.
Loading…
What the club lists him as
An injury listing and a projected slot are the club's statements relayed by a licensed feed, shown with their dates. CapOrCup infers nothing from them.
Projected slot · line 2 right wing, first power-play unit (VAN depth chart as of 2026-09-28; Sportradar NHL API v7, team depth charts)
Games missed
The NHL publishes no injury feed. This counts games his club played while he did not dress, for any reason: injury, illness, a healthy scratch, a suspension or a trade gap. No cause is claimed.
Speed, shot and ice
From the NHL's own player-tracking data. Percentiles are the NHL's: the share of the league below this player.