Returning regular · 2025-26
Cole Sillinger
Columbus Blue Jackets · C · L shot · age 23 at the dated snapshot.
- Team
- CBJ
- Lane
- C
- Age
- 23
Production and deployment
How the points were built
Official NHL 2025–26 regular-season reports. A missing split stays “—”; it is never converted to zero.
Organizational context
6 C regulars in CBJ
The all-team median is 7. CBJ’s farm system ranks #21 in the maintained two-board consensus.
Questions a GM still has to answer
- How much of the scoring comes at five-on-five, on special teams, or into an empty net?
- Is the player creating the play, finishing it, or receiving a secondary point?
- Does deployment reveal trust, scarcity, underuse, or a role the roster cannot offer?
- What contract, acquisition cost, development alternative and Cup-window effect complete the argument?
Tonight
CBJ do not play today
League schedule for 2026-09-29; next league date 2026-09-30.
Nothing listed against him.
White noise · as of 2026-09-29 · social 2026-09-29
Cole Sillinger is in the middle of the pack for attention (51th percentile)
How much he is being talked about: the league's own stories tagged to him, daily pageviews of his Wikipedia article against his own 90-day baseline, posts naming him on the connected networks (Bluesky), and the roster moves and listings that make noise. A measure of attention. Whether it affects a player is his business, and a question the history will let us test later.
Social: 1 post named him this week on Bluesky · 7 likes, reposts and replies · no baseline yet, it needs a week of readings.
Contract · CBJ
$4.63M cap hit
2026–27 through 2028–29. Certified
Role question › Costs more per point than the position median and is below the line on five-on-five creation and penalty-kill use. Either the contract or the deployment needs a look.
- Cost and production both sit close to his position's median. Nothing unusual drives this reading.
- 37 real points at this cap hit would pass the cost test (he had 28, after 5 empty-net left out).
- A five-on-five rate of 1.68 per 60 (he had 1.33) or a regular penalty-kill role (1:00+ a night) would pass the Cup side.
Shot quality · 2025-26
Expected goals
CapOrCup's shot model (distance, angle, shot type, strength, rebounds, rushes), trained on 2023-24 and 2024-25 and tested on unseen games (AUC 0.756). Finishing is goals minus expected goals; it is noisy in one season.
CapOrCup measures · 2025-26
What happens while he plays
Measured from the league's play-by-play and shift charts, not from the scoresheet. Expected goals are counted for every player on the ice, and a goal is credited to whoever was on the ice when the sequence began, including players who had changed off before it was scored.
Advanced scoring · 2025-26
Goals, assists and plus/minus, weighted by what they changed
Every goal counts the win probability it added, scaled so the average goal is 1.0: a late tying goal counts several, a goal at 6-1 or into an empty net late counts little. Plus/minus also credits the players on the ice when the goal's sequence began.
Shot map · 2025-26
Where he shoots from, and how it goes
Every unblocked shot placed by distance, angle and shot type. His rate from each spot is set against the league's rate for the same shot from the same spot, so the edge is against everyone else taking that shot, not against an average.
Career arc · era-adjusted points per 82 games
Cole Sillinger, season by season
Each dot is one season. The amber bar is what his earlier seasons and his age predicted for that season (80% band), so a dot far above its bar is a season the numbers did not see coming. The shaded band is where most players at his position sit at each age.
Position band: quantile regression (10th/50th/90th) of qualifying seasons on an age spline, weighted for players who drop out.
What the numbers found
No shipped label applies. A label is a measured finding about a run of seasons (for example, a spike that came back to the old level), and it is shown only for label types that passed their test on held-out seasons.
Projection at the draft
At the draft the model expected 74 NHL hours through his age-25 season (80% band 7 to 119). He logged 92 hours, between the median and the 90th percentile. The model was applied to his draft class without being fitted or tested on it.
Every season
| Season | Age | GP | Level | Expected (80%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | 18 | 79 | 29.4 | 14.4 to 72.0 |
| 2022-23 | 19 | 64 | 12.8 | 21.8 to 53.8 |
| 2023-24 | 20 | 77 | 31.5 | 14.1 to 44.5 |
| 2024-25 | 21 | 66 | 38.8 | 19.4 to 50.1 |
| 2025-26 | 22 | 81 | 30.8 | 26.3 to 56.0 |
Source: CapOrCup careers desk (method and league curves) · as of 2026-09-29
Comparables at the same age
Who looked like this at 19 to 22
Careers are compared as league-adjusted points per game by age, over the same ages. The comparables below are the closest lines, and what matters is the spread of what they did next, not any single name.
This player so far: age 13 SAAHL U15 2.57 → age 14 CSSHL U15 2.77 → age 15 SMAAAHL 1.95 → age 16 WHL 1.10 → age 17 USHL 1.48 → age 18 NHL 0.39 → age 19 NHL 0.17 → age 20 NHL 0.42 → age 21 NHL 0.50 → age 22 NHL 0.41
| Player | Distance (lower is closer) | What he did afterwards |
|---|---|---|
| Morgan BarronC · matched at ages 19, 20, 21, 22 | 0.06 | age 23 NHL 0.08 → age 24 NHL 0.30 → age 25 NHL 0.23 → age 26 NHL 0.20 → age 27 NHL 0.35 |
| Theo RochetteC · matched at ages 19, 20, 21, 22 | 0.06 | age 23 NL 0.45 → age 24 NL 0.51 |
| Justin BrazeauR · matched at ages 19, 20, 21, 22 | 0.07 | age 23 AHL 0.11 → age 24 AHL 0.28 → age 25 AHL 0.31 → age 26 NHL 0.37 → age 27 NHL 0.35 |
| Alexander KerfootC · matched at ages 19, 20, 21, 22 | 0.07 | age 23 NHL 0.54 → age 24 NHL 0.54 → age 25 NHL 0.43 → age 26 NHL 0.41 → age 27 NHL 0.62 |
| Brock NelsonC · matched at ages 19, 20, 21, 22 | 0.08 | age 23 NHL 0.51 → age 24 NHL 0.49 → age 25 NHL 0.56 → age 26 NHL 0.43 → age 27 NHL 0.65 |
| Artturi LehkonenL · matched at ages 19, 20, 21, 22 | 0.08 | age 23 NHL 0.38 → age 24 NHL 0.39 → age 25 NHL 0.28 → age 26 NHL 0.50 → age 27 NHL 0.80 |
| Jesperi KotkaniemiC · matched at ages 19, 20, 21, 22 | 0.08 | age 23 NHL 0.34 → age 24 NHL 0.42 → age 25 NHL 0.21 |
| Filip ChytilC · matched at ages 19, 20, 21, 22 | 0.08 | age 23 NHL 0.61 → age 24 NHL 0.60 → age 25 NHL 0.49 → age 26 NHL 0.25 |
Reading it
If most comparables became NHL regulars and their later peak sits well above this player's current line, the numbers say there is room to grow. If most did not, the numbers say the odds are against it. Either way it is what the data shows, not a name chosen to flatter.
Goal archive ·
Every goal, with the league's video
Preseason, regular season and playoffs are kept apart. Each row links to the NHL's own highlight page; no video is hosted here. Where a clip has been reviewed, the reading of it is a model judgement of the frames, not a measurement.
Loading…
Club listings · licensed feeds
What the club lists him as
An injury listing and a projected slot are the club's statements relayed by a licensed feed, shown with their dates. CapOrCup infers nothing from them.
Projected slot · line 3 right wing (CBJ depth chart as of 2026-09-28; Sportradar NHL API v7, team depth charts)
Availability
Games missed
The NHL publishes no injury feed. This counts games his club played while he did not dress, for any reason: injury, illness, a healthy scratch, a suspension or a trade gap. No cause is claimed.
Either side of that absence: 2.27 points per 60 in the ten games before, 0.78 in the ten after. A rate change over a small sample, not evidence of a lingering injury.
NHL EDGE tracking · 2025-26
Speed, shot and ice
From the NHL's own player-tracking data. Percentiles are the NHL's: the share of the league below this player.