
Radek Faksa
Dallas Stars · C · shoots L · 32 · UFA at expiry
Contract, value & projections
- Paid
- 1.9% of the cap · through 2027–28 · the contract
- Worth
- 1.4% of the cap · Cap: paid at or above the market
- Next
- Not on file (not projected yet)
- Drive (3 seasons)
- points of chance share lost with him on · what this is#609Radek Faksa Drive rank: 80% rank range 463 to 648 of 678 Likely a top-600 skater; anywhere from 463rd to 648th.
NYI at DAL
Projected slot from the licensed depth chart; props from the model's learned layer on shots, finishing and the opposing starter; ratings are last season's until this one has enough games. Information, not a recommendation.
Nothing listed against Radek Faksa.
How the points were built
Official NHL 2025–26 regular-season reports. A missing split stays “—”; it is never converted to zero.
C regulars in DAL
The all-team median is . DAL’s farm system sits #31 in the maintained two-board consensus.
Questions a GM still has to answer
- How much of the scoring comes at five-on-five, on special teams, or into an empty net?
- Is the player creating the play, finishing it, or receiving a secondary point?
- Does deployment reveal trust, scarcity, underuse, or a role the roster cannot offer?
- What contract, acquisition cost, development alternative and Cup-window effect complete the argument?
Radek Faksa is talked about more than most (72nd percentile); attention this week is 4.85× his usual
How much he is being talked about: the league's own stories tagged to him, daily pageviews of his Wikipedia article against his own 90-day baseline, posts naming him on the connected networks (Bluesky), and the roster moves and listings that make noise. A measure of attention. Whether it affects a player is his business, and a question the history will let us test later.
Social: .
cap hit
2025–26 through 2027–28 · UFA at expiry. Certified
Both signals › Cheaper than his position's median cost per point AND drives five-on-five scoring or kills penalties.
Where Radek Faksa ranks, and how sure we are
Each rank is the 10th to 90th percentile of his place when every skater's value is redrawn 1,000 times from his own band. One season rarely separates a player from the dozens around him.
- #609#463 to #648 of 678
Likely a top-600 skater; anywhere from 463rd to 648th.
In 0 of 100 seasons like this one, he finishes in the top ten.
0 of 20 dots sit above zero (the average regular). Each dot is one equally likely outcome (1 in 20). - #532#217 to #633 of 678
Likely a top-500 skater; anywhere from 217th to 633rd.
In 0 of 100 seasons like this one, he finishes in the top ten.
5 of 20 dots sit above zero (the average regular). Each dot is one equally likely outcome (1 in 20). - #630#403 to #688 of 744
Likely a top-600 skater; anywhere from 403rd to 688th.
In 0 of 100 seasons like this one, he finishes in the top ten.
0 of 20 dots sit above zero (the average regular). Each dot is one equally likely outcome (1 in 20). - #670#471 to #674 of 678
Could sit anywhere in the field of 678; anywhere from 471st to 674th.
In 0 of 100 seasons like this one, he finishes in the top ten.
1 of 20 dots sit above zero (the average regular). Each dot is one equally likely outcome (1 in 20). - #75#21 to #393 of 678
Likely a top-150 skater; anywhere from 21st to 393rd.
In 4 of 100 seasons like this one, he finishes in the top ten.
17 of 20 dots sit above zero (the average regular). Each dot is one equally likely outcome (1 in 20).
Expected goals
CapOrCup's shot model (distance, angle, shot type, strength, rebounds, rushes), trained on 2023-24 and 2024-25 and tested on unseen games (AUC ). Finishing is goals minus expected goals; it is noisy in one season.
What happens while he plays
Measured from the league's play-by-play and shift charts, not from the scoresheet. Expected goals are counted for every player on the ice, and a goal is credited to whoever was on the ice when the sequence began, including players who had changed off before it was scored.
Goals, assists and plus/minus, weighted by what they changed
Every goal counts the win probability it added, scaled so the average goal is 1.0: a late tying goal counts several, a goal at 6-1 or into an empty net late counts little. Plus/minus also credits the players on the ice when the goal's sequence began.
Speed, shot and ice
From the NHL's own player-tracking data. Percentiles are the NHL's: the share of the league below this player.
Every goal, with the league's video
Preseason, regular season and playoffs are kept apart. Each row links to the NHL's own highlight page; no video is hosted here. Where a clip has been reviewed, the reading of it is a model judgement of the frames, not a measurement.
Loading…
Radek Faksa, season by season
Each dot is one season. The amber bar is what his earlier seasons and his age predicted for that season (), so a dot far above its bar is a season the numbers did not see coming. The shaded band is where most players at his position sit at each age.
Position band: .
What the numbers found
No shipped label applies. A label is a measured finding about a run of seasons (for example, a spike that came back to the old level), and it is shown only for label types that passed their test on held-out seasons.
Projection at the draft
At the draft the model expected through his age-25 season (80% band ). He logged , between the 10th percentile and the median.
Every season
| Season | Age | GP | Level | Expected (80%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | ||||
| 2016-17 | ||||
| 2017-18 | ||||
| 2018-19 | ||||
| 2019-20 | ||||
| 2020-21 | ||||
| 2021-22 | ||||
| 2022-23 | ||||
| 2023-24 | ||||
| 2024-25 | ||||
| 2025-26 | ||||
| 2026-27 |
Source: CapOrCup careers desk (method and league curves) · as of 2026-10-18
What the club lists him as
An injury listing and a projected slot are the club's statements relayed by a licensed feed, shown with their dates. CapOrCup infers nothing from them.
Projected slot · (DAL depth chart as of 2026-10-12; Sportradar NHL API v7, team depth charts)
Games missed
The NHL publishes no injury feed. This counts games his club played while he did not dress, for any reason: injury, illness, a healthy scratch, a suspension or a trade gap. No cause is claimed.
Who looked like this at
Careers are compared as league-adjusted points per game by age, over the same ages. The comparables below are the closest lines, and what matters is the spread of what they did next, not any single name.
This player so far:
| Player | Distance (lower is closer) | What he did afterwards |
|---|---|---|
| Casey CizikasC · matched at ages | ||
| Justin DowlingC · matched at ages | ||
| Garnet HathawayR · matched at ages | ||
| Nicolas DeslauriersL · matched at ages | ||
| Nic DowdC · matched at ages | ||
| Noel AcciariC · matched at ages | ||
| Tyler PitlickC · matched at ages | ||
| Sam CarrickC · matched at ages |
Reading it
If most comparables became NHL regulars and their later peak sits well above this player's current line, the numbers say there is room to grow. If most did not, the numbers say the odds are against it. Either way it is what the data shows, not a name chosen to flatter.
Radek Faksa: role, system and coach, as measured
What the shift charts say about Radek Faksa's role and his club's game, and what the rules allow. No fit number is shown: fit: not yet validated.
Rules that travel with him: blocked. Club-specific rules (50 contracts, 23-man roster, the two front offices) are on each team's Moves tab.
- Trade protection: passes. no clause reported in the sources on file. CBA Art. 11.8(a)
- Waiver exemption: blocked. signed at 20: past 3 seasons or 160 NHL games (now season 13, 766 games). CBA Art. 13.4
as of 2026-04-16