Returning regular · 2025-26

Victor Eklund

New York Islanders · RW · — shot · age 19 at the dated snapshot.

Team: NYI
Lane: RW
Age: 19

Production and deployment

How the points were built

Official NHL 2025–26 regular-season reports. A missing split stays “—”; it is never converted to zero.

Games1

Goals0

Assists1

Points1

Even strength1all even-strength points

Power play0

Short handed0

Empty net0

5v5 points / 600

Average TOI15:30

PP TOI2:29

PK TOI0:00

Organizational context

2 RW regulars in NYI

The all-team median is 3.5. NYI’s farm system ranks #12 in the maintained two-board consensus.

Thin lane

Questions a GM still has to answer

How much of the scoring comes at five-on-five, on special teams, or into an empty net?
Is the player creating the play, finishing it, or receiving a secondary point?
Does deployment reveal trust, scarcity, underuse, or a role the roster cannot offer?
What contract, acquisition cost, development alternative and Cup-window effect complete the argument?

Comparables at the same age

Who looked like this at 16 to 19

Careers are compared as league-adjusted points per game by age, over the same ages. The comparables below are the closest lines, and what matters is the spread of what they did next, not any single name.

Comparables found8

Went on to two or more NHL seasons0 of 8

Their later peak (adjusted pts/game)0.45median across the comparables; this player's own line is below

This player so far: age 15 J18 Region 1.36 → age 16 J18 Region 1.00 → age 17 J20 Nationell 0.83 → age 18 HockeyAllsvenskan 0.74 → age 19 SHL 0.56

All 3 columns shown

Player	Distance (lower is closer)	What he did afterwards
Joe ConnorLW · matched at ages 17, 18, 19	0.01	age 20 NCAA 0.18 → age 21 NCAA 0.29
T.J. HughesR · matched at ages 16, 18, 19	0.02	age 20 AJHL 0.42 → age 21 NCAA 0.35 → age 22 NCAA 0.45 → age 23 NCAA 0.40 → age 24 NCAA 0.55
Zam PlanteC · matched at ages 16, 17, 18, 19	0.03	age 20 NCAA 0.23 → age 21 NCAA 0.48
Hunter HaightC · matched at ages 17, 18, 19	0.03	age 20 AHL 0.23 → age 21 AHL 0.27
Tye FelhaberL · matched at ages 16, 17, 18, 19	0.03	age 20 OHL 0.45 → age 21 AHL 0.09 → age 22 AHL 0.12 → age 23 AHL 0.07 → age 24 AHL 0.28
James MalatestaL · matched at ages 16, 17, 18, 19	0.03	age 20 NHL 0.36 → age 21 AHL 0.15 → age 22 AHL 0.14
Lucas EdmondsRW · matched at ages 16, 17, 18, 19	0.03	age 20 HockeyAllsvenskan 0.03 → age 21 OHL 0.47 → age 22 AHL 0.25 → age 23 AHL 0.16 → age 24 AHL 0.09
Jacob JulienC · matched at ages 17, 18, 19	0.03	age 20 OHL 0.23 → age 21 AHL 0.10

Reading it

If most comparables became NHL regulars and their later peak sits well above this player's current line, the numbers say there is room to grow. If most did not, the numbers say the odds are against it. Either way it is what the data shows, not a name chosen to flatter.

Atlantic

Metropolitan

Central

Pacific